So I finally get to write my own entry for the Super User Blog! Very excited to be here. I’ve been asked to write specifically because I’ve just started working as a developer for Macrium Reflect, a disk imaging solution for Windows-based PCs and super user features a lot of backup questions. So here goes, an as-close-to-canonical tour of disk imaging as I can write. I’ve tried not to be overly technical here, whilst giving you the knowledge to understand the essentials; however, it gets technical from time to time.
Why would I want disk imaging?
Ever lost all of your data? Our company founder did; that’s why he created the product we now work on. My personal backup strategy has always revolved around the idea of backing up copies of important files – I’ll back up /home or My Documents and I’ll be fine! Yes, to an extent I will not lose any of my data if I run that regularly; however, I have a lot of programs installed. An awful lot. Each with tweaked configurations. It’s fair to say that if my machine dies, I’ll spend a few weeks hunting through to find all those weird tweaks and config changes I’ve made.
The same was true for my current boss and as a contractor, the downtime really hurt. What he wanted was a simple way to be able to restore a working system from a backup and have everything – every program, every driver – work as it was. So, Macrium Reflect was born and a few years later it’s not quite so simple… although it does indeed restore disk images!
Don’t talk about backups, talk about recovery.
In a way this is going to be the theme of this blog entry. Joel has blogged on this topic, so we’ll do a quick executive summary: it doesn’t matter how painless, smooth and efficient your backups are, if recovering your data is not as easy, the time and frustration cost of an incident will be huge. You want easy recovery – or as easy as you can get.
What is a disk image, how does it work and how can I take one on a running system?
A disk image is exactly what it sounds like – a file storing an exact copy of your disk’s data. Actually, that’s not quite true: To understand this, we’re going to have to talk a little about file systems. A file system can be thought of as a filing system, a scheme for storing data on a disk. There are various ways and schemes for doing this, depending on the requirements of the end user. Now, the file system must not only write data to a disk, but also a certain amount of meta data such that when it comes to finding a particular file, the computer can. Actually, we can use this fact for an important purpose. The metadata allows us to pick out sectors on the disk which are in-use storing data we want to keep and ignore sectors marked as free. Which leads us to the first choice of the evening:
- Active Sector Backups: This type of backup stores only the active sectors and filesystem metadata. When the image is written back to a disk, the data is written in the correct location on the disk – and the file system knows no different.
- Full copies: These are bit-for-bit copies of the file system, which take up more space and are technically unnecessary. However, there is an important use-case for a full-copy backup: forensic examination of a disk.
So what constitutes a disk image really depends on how you’re backing it up – and which you choose depends on your storage capabilities, and trust in your software’s file system processing.
Now – live file systems. Well, the most obvious method for doing backups is to use the built-in Windows functionality, the Volume Shadow Copy Service. This is a Windows-provided snapshot system which provides a number of backup methods and is very flexible – see the msdn article.
It is, also, of course, possible to achieve this yourself. The technique for doing this is called copy-on-write; that is, any block that is written to is also duplicated to an extra copy first. When you come to read back the image, you can read the file system, or the store of the point-in-time data, depending on whether it has changed or not. Other operating systems, file systems etc. provide a variety of near-equivalent methods; the important point here being that it is safe to image a live hard disk by employing some fairly well known techniques.
Not always the full picture
We’ve alluded to the next topic with the copy on write idea above. If you take an image of a hard disk on the 1st of the month and then again on the 2nd of the month, you have two whole images – a bit of a waste of space if all that’s changed on that box is a few server logs. You might think, “Hey, we could just store the bits that have changed!” — You’d be right. There are two very similar strategies which use this “differential technique”. Both assume a full backup at some point in time.
- Differential backups: These are the difference between the last full backup and the one just taken. The next time an image is taken, it is also the difference between the current state and the last full backup – so all images until the next full backup are the difference between that point in time and the full backup. To recover one of these backups, you need both the full backup and the differential backup. Clearly, these take less space than a full backup.
- Incremental backups: These are like differential backups, but instead of always being the difference to the last full backup, they are the difference from the last incremental backup (or full backup, if none exists previously). These backups have the potential to take up the least space – but there’s a caveat – you need both the original full backup and each of the incremental backups taken to restore your system.
As you’d probably expect, performing either an incremental or differential backup is vastly quicker than a full backup – which can be a very important factor when you’re backing up every day.
Sounds easy! I’ll just go copy some partitions…
…wait right there. To recover your whole system and image your entire disk, you’re not just talking about partitions – you need to know about the partition scheme in use and any boot considerations this may entail.
In modern PCs, there are two types of partitioning scheme:
- Master Boot Record disks, which can have at most four primary partitions (although this is worked around with an extended/logical partitions).
- GUID Partitioning Scheme (GPT) disks. These can have (on Windows) 128 Partitions and are used with EFI systems for booting – they can not be booted from a MBR-based BIOS.
MBR is by far the most common scheme, but GPT/EFI systems are becoming more popular (and are used in modern Macs) as support now exists in 64-bit Windows systems.
But that’s not all. Older systems (XP and earlier – you probably have this if you have upgraded) use Cylinder, Head, Sector as a partition alignment scheme, whereas newer systems use a 1MB alignment scheme. It turns out a SSD design flaw means that CHS schemes may degrade disks far more quickly than the newer scheme. Your disk, when imaged, will be aligned as per the scheme it was created with (and upgrading Windows won’t have changed it, either!) so do make sure if deploying to an SSD you have software capable of re-aligning your partitions. More here.
Live rescue media schmedia, why do I want that?
Having backup software that runs whilst you work is great – it doesn’t interrupt you. But if your hard disk fails, you’re not going to be able to boot your system; when you pop that fresh disk in, it’ll be empty and you won’t be able to boot. Being able to boot and recover your system from live media is absolutely essential.
There are some considerations to bear in mind here. You need rescue media capable of recovering your system; ideally, you’ll have tested it. Rescue media generally comes in two flavours: Linux, and Windows Preinstallation Environment (“Windows Lite”). If you’re running some esoteric hardware for which one of these environments does not have drivers, you really do need to know beforehand; some software (such as ours!) can incorporate drivers into PE images.
Another consideration is access to your images. If you intend to use a network, you’ll need to check you can from this media; you’ll also need to check any external storage you wish to mount works.
So now we’re getting around thinking more about recovery, let’s do some more thinking.
Fixing bootloader errors and deploying to new hardware
So, now we’re all backed up with a great imaging scheme. We’ve got rescue media just in case and we know it works with our kit. Great! Then something goes wrong – no problem! We can handle this!
Except that our motherboard has failed and it’s 3 years old. They’re not available anywhere you can see and you can’t spend enough time at work on ebay to hunt down that spare one somebody’s selling and you can’t afford it now the bids are getting large anyway. Oh dear – this image we’ve got isn’t a perfect, working backup.
There is a way around this – we call it redeploy: the ability to insert drivers into a new install before you boot it. Our specific system, I am reliably informed, will also update the HAL drivers and CPU type when you move to a new system.
Another consideration is the ability to repair Windows bootloader settings on redeploy. An example I have worked on recently: On systems running PGP Whole Desktop Encryption, we can take images, but they are unencrypted (more on that in a second). We can then restore them as needed – except the PGP bootloader remained in the MBR (I’d only imaged the partitions I wanted, not the whole disk). Being able to fix problems in booting is something you may well need.
So, I’ve briefly touched disk encryption – now here’s how it works. Either your controller (hard disk) handles the crypto and issues a bios interrupt on boot to allow a password to be inserted (or token), in which case it is totally invisible to software, or software handles the crypto by inserting a driver just above the block layer stuff and below the file system. The effect is the same: when the system is running, imaging software will image the unencrypted data, as the encryption process is transparent to it. However, the live media will only be able to image the encrypted disk and may fail interpreting it. If you employ disk encryption, do investigate your compatibility options.
Extracting images, partial recovery
All this talk of recovering whole systems is great; however, there are times where you just want part of a system to be extracted – usually for user data. Or you might want to look at a specific image. Many backup programs offer you the ability to mount your recovery images and extract data from them; this is a good way to ensure your backup has worked – you can run
on drive X to verify the data is intact, on Windows systems.
So, that is all for a basic introduction to disk imaging and system backup. I’ll leave you with a quick backup checklist:
A recovery checklist
- Recovery Hardware: can I recover to different hardware?
- Recovery viability: can you afford to recover to when you need to, given your storage constraints for storing backups?
- No-recoverable interval: how much data do you lose if you have to recover? How often are snapshots made?
- Recovery testing: have you tested your recovery plan?
- Recovery time: how long can you get back to the mission critical work of reading blogs?
Ninefingers is a software developer writing C, C++, stepping through crash dumps and disk images to create Macrium Reflect, the best disk imaging solution for Windows with a free edition that just works and paid editions with bar-none the best support in the industry. There are other products, but they all suck. Buy ours instead.
The last is the reason they don’t let me do marketing