Video Conversion done right: Codecs and Software

November 7, 2011 by . 6 comments

Videos are everywhere. They come in quite a few different formats – all with their own advantages and disadvantages. Converting videos from one format to another is a very simple task, given the right tools. In this post, we will go through the most popular video codecs and the software you need to get the best results.

Current Video Codecs and Containers

Before we begin to encode, we have to ask: What is a video codec? “Codec” stands for encoder/decoder. A video codec specifies the software (or the algorithm) to convert video files into a bitstream and then decode that bitstream into a video again. But why is there even a need for codecs? Every video is a sequence of frames, mostly more than 25 frames per second. This is a lot of data. Codecs, when used to compress videos, try to reduce this data using some visual tricks.

  • Codecs take a video and convert it into a bitstream, mostly with the goal to minimize its size.
  • Containers on the other hand are file formats that are supposed to wrap video and audio into a single file. Video codecs don’t know anything about audio encoding, so this is why there is a need to synchronize them for playback.

Codecs mostly encode video with regard to a specification. Almost every specification for video has been written by the Motion Picture Experts Group. This is why most video formats are known under a MPEG acronym. There is always one specification, but there can be an arbitrary number of codecs for this specification.

These days, there are a lot of codecs around. We will take a look at the best and most widely used ones. The following is partly taken from my answer to the question What is a Codec (e.g. DivX?), and how does it differ from a File Format (e.g. MPG)?. Also see this answer for an explanation of current containers.

MPEG-2

This is mostly used on DVDs and TV broadcasting. It offers high quality at the expense of high file sizes. It’s been the main choice for video compression for many many years now. Encoders are often found embedded into hardware. The encoding scheme is very basic and therefore allows for fast encoding and fast playback.

At some point though, its quality is not good enough for low bitrates. While a satellite or cable transmission offered enough bitrate for a high quality MPEG-2 video, it just wasn’t good enough for the internet and multimedia age.

  • Containers for MPEG-2: Mostly found within an .mpg container
  • Encoders for MPEG-2: CinemaCraft, TMPGEnc, MainConcept and ffmpeg

Basically, you only want to create MPEG-2 videos if you really don’t care about storage size, or you want to put videos on a Video DVD. Note that many applications for authoring Video DVDs will already convert to MPEG-2 for you.

MPEG-4 Part II

When it became clear that MPEG-2 was not enough, MPEG-4 was released. Actually, MPEG-4 is a huge standard consisting of many parts, only one of which is about basic video coding: MPEG-4 Part II.

This is probably the one used mostly to encode videos for the web. It offers good quality at practical file sizes, which means one can burn a whole movie onto a CD (whereas with MPEG-2 you would have needed a DVD).

Its drawback is that the quality itself might not be good enough for some viewers.

  • Containers for MPEG-4 Part II: Mostly in .avi
  • Encoders for MPEG-4 Part II: DivX, XviD, Nero Digital
  • Audio used in MPEG-4 Part II: Mostly MP3.

So, if you want to rip a DVD without taking too much time, and at the same time ensuring best compatibility with current DVD players, go for this.

MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (h.264)

This is the big boss, the number one codec today. It offers superb quality at small file sizes and therefore is perfectly suited for all kinds of video for the internet.

Converting video for small bandwidths is its main purpose. Originally, it was called h.264 (and one can see that this has nothing to do with the MPEG). In fact, the ITU created it based on h.263 – both were meant for videoconferencing. They however joined efforts and created this new standard.

h.264 is found in almost every modern application or device, from phones to camcorders, even on Blu Ray disks: Video is now encoded in h.264. Its quality vs. file size ratio is just so much better than what you could achieve with MPEG-2 or even MPEG-4 Part 2. The main disadvantage is that it is very slow to encode as it has some vast algorithmic improvements over them (which take a lot of time to compute).

  • Containers for h.264: .mp4, .mkv, .mov.
  • Encoders for h.264: x264, Mainconcept, QuickTime
  • Audio used in h.264: Mostly AAC (MPEG-4 Audio).

If you upload videos to the web, this is your choice. Also, if you want the best quality at the lowest file size, you should always use h.264. In my experience, x264 is the best free encoder for h.264 out there.


Set up your Codecs

Most current operating systems don’t come with all codecs (encoders and decoders) installed. This is mainly due to legal and licensing issues. However there are codec packs that you can easily install later.

  • Windows: The K-Lite Codec Pack offers almost everything there is. The Standard package should be enough for most users.
  • OS X: Perian is a QuickTime component for OS X that allows native playback for all popular codecs within the QuickTime framework.
  • Linux: Depending on your distribution, there are probably some codec packages in the repositories. For example, in Ubuntu there are RestrictedFormats which can be easily installed later on.

Now that you have your codecs installed, you will be able to play almost every video (and audio) file there is.


Software for Converting Videos

Of course, there are lots of applications that allow you to convert video from one format to another. Some of them are commercial, but a huge part is free.

Why is that? It turns out that there is a free and open source video toolkit called ffmpeg. It is based on the libavcodec and libavformat libraries, which are a libraries of encoders, decoders, multiplexers and demultiplexers for almost every video codec and format there is today. The fact that it is available for almost every platform, from a Windows PC to an Android phone, makes it extremely versatile. It also offers very good quality when compared to the professional tools.

Because it’s free and open source, it is the basis for almost every free video conversion software. One of the most popular ones is Handbrake. Let’s take a quick look at it.

Use Handbrake!

Handbrake is free and available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux (including deb and rpm packages). The installers can be downloaded from the Handbrake website. It is extremely useful for extracting videos from a DVD or converting videos for devices such as iPods or video streaming servers. Note that one downside of Handbrake is that it won’t output .avi files, which are sometimes needed for playback on legacy devices.

Let’s install it and open the application. It looks a bit different on Windows and Linux, but the functionality is of course the same.

Once you open it, it will ask you for a source video. There are quite a few settings:

  • Video Codec: Here you can choose between h.264 and MPEG-4 Part II. Choose whatever fits your needs. If you want a video targeted for modern mobile devices or the web, go for h.264. This should be fine for almost every situation. If you want to create a movie CD for a DVD player capable of playing back XviD/DivX, you should choose MPEG-4. Also, MPEG-4 is still necessary for some older mobile devices. Note that encoding to h.264 takes longer than for MPEG-4.
  • Framerate: You should choose to keep the source frame rate unless you have other specific requirements. This makes sure you won’t get any stuttering picture.
  • Quality: Now you should think about how whether you have file size constraints (such as when encoding for a DVD) or quality constraints. Setting an average bitrate can help when you know that you want to stream the video and you can only stream up to 1500 kilobit per second. Fiddling around with “Constant quality” can sometimes be useful, but it can result in either too large files or too bad quality.

This is probably everything you need. Note that encoding a video that is already encoded might decrease its quality, so if you can use a higher bit rate or quality setting, do it!

Sometimes you might want to resize a video. Use the “Picture Settings” tool located in the toolbar.

In order to be able to change the picture size, set “Anamorphic” to “loose”. This will allow you to scale the video keeping the aspect ratio.

Windows-only alternatives

SUPER©

SUPER is an ffmpeg-based encoder written for Windows. Once you find the download link on the website, you’re good to go. Hint: It’s at the bottom of this page. The interface might seem a bit cheap, but SUPER can convert almost everything. It is based on ffmpeg as well, so you should see the same results from either using Handbrake or SUPER.

SUPER’s advantage over Handbrake is that it can output .avi files, as already stated above. It is also scriptable in case you need to convert a larger number of videos at once.

Once started, SUPER gives you a list of options. You should choose your container and video codec first, depending on your needs. The rest is quite self-explanatory (although the choice of it might seem overwhelming at first). Just make sure you don’t change the video resolution unless absolutely necessary and keep the frame rate the same.

FormatFactory

FormatFactory is ad-supported, but freeware. It might also not look that nice, but it definitely gets the job done. Have a look at the options which now should look familiar to you. It also allows ripping DVDs to a more suitable format.

OS X only alternatives

FFmpegX

ffmpegX bundles the ffmpeg library into a GUI application. Although the contained version of ffmpeg is not the latest (it’s from 2008), this tool will help you convert videos between different formats.

Its video settings allow you to calculate the necessary bitrate for a given file size, or vice-versa. You can also tell it to convert the video so it exactly fits on one CD. What’s very nice about ffmpegX is its collection of tools. With those, you can for example multiplex a video and audio stream, or you can join two separate video files. It also allows you to repair a broken AVI file.

Wrapping it up

In this post I gave you a quick overview about current codecs and how to choose them for your needs. We’ve seen a few tools, but of course, there are a lot more! Which ones do you use on a regular basis? What is there for Linux?

In my next post, I’d like to show you how to use ffmpeg as a command line tool, because it offers all the functionality you get from a GUI tool, but has the benefit of being easily scriptable. I’ll try to give you some examples you can bookmark to use whenever you need to convert videos.

6 Comments

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  • journeymangeek says:

    I tend to use CCCP over klite as far as codecs go. In addition, if you’re running intel video adaptors, and windows 7 or vista, there’s a really good built in h264 codec which you can use with MPC – I used the set up guide here http://imouto.my/watching-h264-videos-using-dxva-clearvideo-version/ to set it up

  • Ismail says:

    [+100 😉 I miss the vote up feature here.]

    Very helpful.

  • Naresh says:

    +1 for CCCP on Windows: http://www.cccp-project.net/

  • Camilo Martin says:

    It’s a shame you didn’t include MeGUI. It’s awesome. In the past, I’ve done countless benchmarks and tests with x264 and video algorithms on top of Avisynth.

    It may not be the most actively developed thing ever, but it does a perfect job, and it’s free.

  • MediaCoder is an awesome alternative to SUPER and offers an INCREDIBLE amount of options for encoding videos. For quite a few common formats, there is an option to choose the encoder to use, so if for example ffmpeg doesn’t quite produce the results you’re looking for, you can switch to, say, mencoder.

  • slhck says:

    @George Thanks for the hint. I’ll include it in the post when I have time to go over it. mencoder is something I’ve personally never tried, but it’s always worth having a second option.

  • Comments have been closed for this post